From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 15 02:37:59 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6862216A4A1 for ; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 02:37:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from on@cs.ait.ac.th) Received: from mail.cs.ait.ac.th (mail.cs.ait.ac.th [192.41.170.16]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA8B013C447 for ; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 02:37:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from on@cs.ait.ac.th) Received: from banyan.cs.ait.ac.th (banyan.cs.ait.ac.th [192.41.170.5]) by mail.cs.ait.ac.th (8.13.1/8.12.11) with ESMTP id m0F2bufs078657 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 15 Jan 2008 09:37:56 +0700 (ICT) Received: (from on@localhost) by banyan.cs.ait.ac.th (8.13.6/8.12.11) id m0F2bqEg000116; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 09:37:52 +0700 (ICT) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 09:37:52 +0700 (ICT) Message-Id: <200801150237.m0F2bqEg000116@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> From: Olivier Nicole To: jalmberg@identry.com In-reply-to: <87A9631B-EAC5-41B8-B4C2-001C3ADBA486@identry.com> (message from John Almberg on Mon, 14 Jan 2008 09:06:20 -0500) References: <87A9631B-EAC5-41B8-B4C2-001C3ADBA486@identry.com> X-Virus-Scanned: on CSIM by amavisd-milter (http://www.amavis.org/) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: No spam??? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 02:37:59 -0000 > I know this is an odd thing to worry about, but is this normal? Since > the spam doesn't even seem to be reaching spamd, I'm guessing that > the real hero is pf, which must be blocking 99.99% of spam at the > packet level. I don't know how you configured pf, but since I use the black list fromhttp://www.sa-blacklist.stearns.org/sa-blacklist/sa-blacklist.current.sendmail-access, I reduced drastically the spam that reaches SpamAssassin. The key point with such black list is that you must trust the list, as there is no place for false positive. Bests, Olivier