From owner-freebsd-hackers Wed Feb 4 06:54:05 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id GAA27425 for hackers-outgoing; Wed, 4 Feb 1998 06:54:05 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from gringo.cdrom.com (root@ppp-013.tky.exa.co.jp [210.129.93.13]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id GAA27372 for ; Wed, 4 Feb 1998 06:53:59 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jkh@gringo.cdrom.com) Received: from gringo.cdrom.com (jkh@localhost.cdrom.com [127.0.0.1]) by gringo.cdrom.com (8.8.8/8.8.5) with ESMTP id GAA00343; Wed, 4 Feb 1998 06:30:43 -0800 (PST) To: Julian Elischer cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: kirk's soft-update integration.. In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 03 Feb 1998 18:21:37 PST." <34D7D0B0.500F9F30@whistle.com> Date: Wed, 04 Feb 1998 06:30:43 -0800 Message-ID: <339.886602643@gringo.cdrom.com> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG X-To-Unsubscribe: mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org "unsubscribe hackers" As long as you can make a "binary weapon" out of this, where we incorporate only those non-poison-pilled portions into FreeBSD (just as OpenBSD has done) and leave it up to the user to add the specially licenced files, I don't see a problem. In fact, I'd really LIKE to see this happen so that those who just want to play with the soft update code and have no commercial aspirations can do so. Heck, even the commercial folks can play, they'll just have to line up and pay Kirk like you guys did. ;) Jordan