Date: Sun, 22 Aug 1999 16:47:24 -0400 (EDT) From: Bill Fumerola <billf@jade.chc-chimes.com> To: Chris Dillon <cdillon@wolves.k12.mo.us> Cc: Wes Peters <wes@softweyr.com>, Cliff Skolnick <cliff@steam.com>, Bigby Findrake <bigby@shiva.eu.org>, jay d <service_account@yahoo.com>, "Rodney W. Grimes" <freebsd@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net>, Evren Yurtesen <yurtesen@ispro.net.tr>, freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: multiple machines in the same network Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.10.9908221646410.96144-100000@jade.chc-chimes.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.10.9908212338280.79245-100000@mail.wolves.k12.mo.us>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 22 Aug 1999, Chris Dillon wrote: > Gotcha I've found by looking at the specs is that it only has a > 3.8Gbit/sec backplane. This is only enough to keep 19 100mbit ports > saturated at full duplex, but you're also paying less money for this > 40-port switch than most other halfway-decent 24-port switches. I > wonder if local switching takes place on each of the "blades" > (expansion modules). I still think its worth the money even with the > limited backplane. That's more backplane then my (more expensive) baystack 450s can handle. -- - bill fumerola - billf@chc-chimes.com - BF1560 - computer horizons corp - - ph:(800) 252-2421 - bfumerol@computerhorizons.com - billf@FreeBSD.org - To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.10.9908221646410.96144-100000>