From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 11 13:07:01 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C87F84C5; Thu, 11 Oct 2012 13:07:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gjb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from onyx.glenbarber.us (onyx.glenbarber.us [IPv6:2607:fc50:1000:c200::face]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C74F8FC0A; Thu, 11 Oct 2012 13:07:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from glenbarber.us (kaos.glenbarber.us [76.124.49.145]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: gjb) by onyx.glenbarber.us (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 969E823F645; Thu, 11 Oct 2012 09:07:00 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2012 09:06:58 -0400 From: Glen Barber To: Claude Buisson Subject: Re: FreeBSD 10-CURRENT and 9-STABLE snapshots Message-ID: <20121011130658.GP10429@glenbarber.us> References: <1349873186577-5750838.post@n5.nabble.com> <5075AA96.6050101@orange.fr> <20121011000901.GK10429@glenbarber.us> <50761430.8090306@orange.fr> <20121011005218.GM10429@glenbarber.us> <5076A28D.509@orange.fr> <20121011113417.GN10429@glenbarber.us> <5076BEDB.4020503@orange.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="51uid+Ur/3ko9cBW" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5076BEDB.4020503@orange.fr> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT amd64 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2012 13:07:01 -0000 --51uid+Ur/3ko9cBW Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 02:43:07PM +0200, Claude Buisson wrote: > I do not see a real interest of filling a PR for cvsup1.fr. I have just d= one the > same test with the same result with cvsup5.de and cvsup10.us. >=20 > www.mavetju.org/unix/freebsd-mirrors/ have all cvsup mirrors in red, and = IIRC > someone wrote on hubs@ that the current test for mirrors was flawed becau= se it > tried at a now inexistent file. And someone else wrote that the project d= oes not > want anymore mirrors which are not under its direct control. >=20 I will do what I can to look into this. > It is clear that there have been a problem at least with lists.freebsd.or= g, but > what astonishes me is the fact that in our glorious 21th century, nobody = thought > to inform people on the mailing lists, or on the home page of www.freebsd= =2Eorg > (no, I do not want to be on Twitter or FaceBook for that kind of informat= ion). >=20 I absolutely understand, and appreciate your input about this. I am sorry that you feel people within the Project do not care. But, I assure you, that is not the case. I cannot speak for anyone but myself in the Project, but as someone who has direct access to make such a chanage to the FreeBSD.org website, I apologize for the lack of announcement. You are right - there should have been some sort of "Some services may be disrupted for a bit", or similar there. I am sorry this was not done. > Thank you for taking the pain of reading my emails. >=20 Thank you for taking the time to outline your concerns. Glen --51uid+Ur/3ko9cBW Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD) iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJQdsRyAAoJEFJPDDeguUajvE0IAKu7X3EC6k3C+24HXwqvd423 a6zbREHLzF4J4k3PRNhW7SoJt7iB1t1eQRSQyas/XwPUn0DHQVrNHfVBfPd8G5ms 91N/C1be9r5V+REe8Zb8vmWm8NinJovO26aKdXSgX8Mcgnf8hHLhTv84TPYEOpcG FmZFgb/p9NKwlvXUPexXLQPBP5TZvIy87pAMNxNI2QNkk9681Ta8/b8DO0sf0RxW 6JifE34n61nk7gvcZIX5nyS27AaeBoUSOzeLjd+JmZ2Rl0P+47ATLb6y418afzrA 4Adeqs8Q1mWeJ2EBtfHP2LPgz+VX96TCcRCrwcCsWFg2Gte/pcsEvWy3yCq37t4= =00Cf -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --51uid+Ur/3ko9cBW--