From owner-freebsd-hackers  Mon Oct 23 20:21:29 1995
Return-Path: owner-hackers
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id UAA28075
          for hackers-outgoing; Mon, 23 Oct 1995 20:21:29 -0700
Received: from seattle.polstra.com (seattle.polstra.com [198.211.214.4])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with SMTP id UAA28063
          for <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>; Mon, 23 Oct 1995 20:21:16 -0700
Received: by seattle.polstra.com (Smail3.1.28.1 #5)
	id m0t7ZvE-000078C; Mon, 23 Oct 95 20:21 PDT
Message-Id: <m0t7ZvE-000078C@seattle.polstra.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Oct 95 20:21 PDT
From: jdp@polstra.com (John Polstra)
To: davidg@Root.COM
Cc: ache@freefall.freebsd.org, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: ld.so, LD_NOSTD_PATH, and suid/sgid programs
Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk

<davidg@Root.COM> wrote:

> Now that I've had some time to think about this, I would rather that
> we just remove support for LD_NOSTD_PATH completely. Except for shared
> library debugging, I can't think of a legitimate use for it.

I agree.

   John Polstra                                       jdp@polstra.com
   Polstra & Co., Inc.                        Seattle, Washington USA
   "Self-knowledge is always bad news."                 -- John Barth