From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 2 22:52:07 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32DBC16A41F; Mon, 2 Jan 2006 22:52:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) Received: from phk.freebsd.dk (phk.freebsd.dk [130.225.244.222]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FB6F43D67; Mon, 2 Jan 2006 22:52:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (unknown [192.168.48.2]) by phk.freebsd.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE2DCBC50; Mon, 2 Jan 2006 22:52:04 +0000 (UTC) To: Colin Percival From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 02 Jan 2006 14:43:30 PST." <43B9AC92.2020400@freebsd.org> Date: Mon, 02 Jan 2006 23:52:04 +0100 Message-ID: <81146.1136242324@critter.freebsd.dk> Sender: phk@critter.freebsd.dk Cc: Matthias Andree , current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD handles leapsecond correctly X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Jan 2006 22:52:07 -0000 In message <43B9AC92.2020400@freebsd.org>, Colin Percival writes: >Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: >> In message <20060102221948.EBE475D09@ptavv.es.net>, "Kevin Oberman" writes: >>>Leap years are an artifact of a lousy calendar that has origins over 2 >>>millennia ago. Many calendars have been proposed which fix this, but >>>calendar reform is simply not going to happen in our society, but leap >>>years are a known, non-varying and trivially calculable issue. No magic >>>and trivial to handle. >> >> Interestingly, the main reason why calendar reform is a no-talk >> issue seems to be that The Vatican owns the standardization area >> of calendars because they have written all (relevant) standards for >> the area in the past. > >Didn't the EU come up with the Feb 24 -> Feb 29 leap day change? > >Anyway, the Vatican certainly hasn't produced all the standards for our >calendar Notice the telltale use of the "(relevant)" on my explanation :-) > -- they may have owned the calendar recently, but before their >days it was mangled by Roman emperors, Remember that the Pope is legally the successor in interest (Pontifex Maximus) of the empire of Rome (which is different from (both of!) the Roman empires). > and I believe that it originated >about 4000 years before that, along the banks of the Nile. That is less relevant, the question is if whoever touched it last still reads their mail. Poul-Henning -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.