Date: Sat, 21 Aug 2004 11:14:00 +0300 From: Maxim Sobolev <sobomax@portaone.com> To: "Vanilla I. Shu" <vanilla@fatpipi.cirx.org> Cc: ports-committers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/net/centericq Makefileports/net/centericq/files extra-patch-gcc34 Message-ID: <41270448.7080501@portaone.com> In-Reply-To: <20040821010059.GA52839@fatpipi.cirx.org> References: <200408201956.i7KJupiA036894@repoman.freebsd.org> <20040821010059.GA52839@fatpipi.cirx.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Vanilla I. Shu wrote: > On Fri, Aug 20, 2004 at 07:56:50PM +0000, Maxim Sobolev wrote: > >>sobomax 2004-08-20 19:56:50 UTC >> FreeBSD ports repository >> Modified files: >> net/centericq Makefile >> Added files: >> net/centericq/files extra-patch-gcc34 >> Log: >> Unbreak with gcc 3.4. >> Obtained from: Gentoo >> Based on: http://www.gentoo.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/net-im/centericq/files/centericq-4.9.12-gcc3.4.patch > > I know you unbreak this ports, > > but how about give a chance to our new committer(clsung)? > > and respect other committer? Well, considering the following factors: a) in no case this patch can make situation worser than it is already; b) port have been broken for the quite some time now, and the problem was already reported on mailing lists several times, so that maintainer certainly had his chance to act; c) I've sent patch to the author of the software, so that hopefully he will integrate it into the next official release. I decided that contacting maintainer doesn't worth it, I apologise if it caused any bad feelings to clsung. In general I think that there are cases (like this for example) when contacting maintainer is not quite necessary. -Maxim
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?41270448.7080501>