From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 20 07:17:55 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12BD816A4CE for ; Tue, 20 Jan 2004 07:17:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from postman.arcor.de (postman4.arcor-online.net [151.189.0.189]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D963E43DA9 for ; Tue, 20 Jan 2004 07:16:45 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from eikemeier@fillmore-labs.com) Received: from fillmore.dyndns.org (port-212-202-51-21.reverse.qsc.de [212.202.51.21]) (authenticated bits=0)i0KFGYM4003491 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Tue, 20 Jan 2004 16:16:36 +0100 (MET) Received: from [172.16.0.2] (helo=fillmore-labs.com) by fillmore.dyndns.org with esmtp (SSLv3:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.30; FreeBSD) id 1AixcI-0005f5-PO; Tue, 20 Jan 2004 16:16:34 +0100 Message-ID: <400D4650.1090706@fillmore-labs.com> Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2004 16:16:32 +0100 From: Oliver Eikemeier Organization: Fillmore Labs GmbH - http://www.fillmore-labs.com/ MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Sergey Matveychuk References: <1074590694.85583.20.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> <400D2939.5090203@fillmore-labs.com> <400D4217.4090901@ciam.ru> In-Reply-To: <400D4217.4090901@ciam.ru> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: KMail/1.5.9 cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: HEADS UP: New bsd.*.mk changes X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2004 15:17:55 -0000 Sergey Matveychuk wrote: > Oliver Eikemeier wrote: > >> Sorry for stepping up so late, but this saves options under >> ${PORT_DBDIR}/${PORTNAME}/options >> >> Lots of ports have the same PORTNAME (ie 'openldap' for >> net/openldap2[012]-(client|server), 'apache' for russian/apache13, >> www/apache(13|13-fp|2|21)). Some conflict, but -client/-server don't. >> Either each port has to set OPTIONSFILE to >> ${PORT_DBDIR}/${PORTNAME}/something, >> or we may use LATEST_LINK instead of PORTNAME: > > Why don't you think we could use ${PORT_DBDIR}/${PKGNAME} instead? > PKGNAME has no conflicts. Won't survive a version bump, which is what this is all about, I guess.