From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 4 11:34:50 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2891316A4CE for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 11:34:50 +0000 (GMT) Received: from alpargata.net (alpargata.net [67.18.172.202]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACF5943D1F for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 11:34:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nospam@illusionart.com) Received: from [192.168.1.100] (dsl081-061-217.dsl-isp.net [64.81.61.217] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by alpargata.net (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j14Bunwo036431; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 05:56:50 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from nospam@illusionart.com) In-Reply-To: <200502040249.18006.kstewart@owt.com> References: <1DF8995C-7694-11D9-8017-000D93C7878E@illusionart.com> <200502040249.18006.kstewart@owt.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v619) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Vonleigh Simmons Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2005 03:34:43 -0800 To: Kent Stewart X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.619) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.80/624/Thu Dec 9 13:01:06 2004 clamav-milter version 0.80j on alpargata.net X-Virus-Status: Clean cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: portsdb -uU fails X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2005 11:34:50 -0000 > When this happens, the easy answer is to user "make fetchindex" and > then > only do a "portsdb -u". That worked fine. I'm confused though, am I not supposed to use the -U flag at all? Because after running those two I tried -Uu again and I got the same error. If I'm not supposed to use -U, has it been replaced by something or is it not necessary? Vonleigh Simmons