From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 4 13:14:09 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5E91106566B; Wed, 4 Jan 2012 13:14:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) Received: from cyrus.watson.org (cyrus.watson.org [65.122.17.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC7C48FC15; Wed, 4 Jan 2012 13:14:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bigwig.baldwin.cx (bigwig.baldwin.cx [96.47.65.170]) by cyrus.watson.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 65EDC46B0C; Wed, 4 Jan 2012 08:14:09 -0500 (EST) Received: from jhbbsd.localnet (unknown [209.249.190.124]) by bigwig.baldwin.cx (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CA288B949; Wed, 4 Jan 2012 08:14:08 -0500 (EST) From: John Baldwin To: Gleb Smirnoff Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2012 08:11:15 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (FreeBSD/8.2-CBSD-20110714-p8; KDE/4.5.5; amd64; ; ) References: <201201031036.50837.jhb@freebsd.org> <20120104115753.GF34721@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20120104115753.GF34721@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="koi8-r" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201201040811.15793.jhb@freebsd.org> X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (bigwig.baldwin.cx); Wed, 04 Jan 2012 08:14:08 -0500 (EST) Cc: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" , freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: periodic emails X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Jan 2012 13:14:09 -0000 On Wednesday, January 04, 2012 6:57:53 am Gleb Smirnoff wrote: > On Tue, Jan 03, 2012 at 10:36:50AM -0500, John Baldwin wrote: > J> > why do we send all these empty headings for periodic emails or given there is > J> > no output to this one can we > J> > > J> > 1) suppress the empty sections (to me that sounds a bit like a wrong > J> > return code or something maybe?), and > J> > 2) add an option to suppress "empty" periodic emails entirely? > J> > J> Have you tried 'daily_show_success="NO"' in /etc/periodic.conf? > J> > J> (Also security_show_success, weekly_show_success, and monthly_show_success?) > J> > J> Those certainly have fixed both 1) and 2) for me. > > Does security_show_success="YES" suppress the security report entirely > (no mail sent), if no security related issues found? > > When I once tried OpenBSD, I loved that security report mail isn't > generated at all if not issues found. Yes. -- John Baldwin