From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 5 02:43:54 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AF1616A416; Sun, 5 Nov 2006 02:43:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from enigma@k1.com.br) Received: from sipserver.k1.com.br (customer-200195195217.idc.onda.com.br [200.195.195.217]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 973454466A; Sun, 5 Nov 2006 02:43:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from enigma@k1.com.br) Received: from k1.com.br (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sipserver.k1.com.br (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id kA3EuQ98014150; Sun, 5 Nov 2006 00:43:59 -0200 (BRST) (envelope-from enigma@k1.com.br) X-MessageWall-Score: 0 (k1.com.br) Received: from [201.21.156.25] (authenticated as k1) by k1.com.br (MessageWall 1.0.8) with SMTP; 5 Nov 2006 02:43:59 -0000 From: Sergio Lenzi To: Ariff Abdullah , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20061103142140.74ecd784.ariff@FreeBSD.org> References: <1162516940.1466.11.camel@localhost> <20061103022427.GA16273@kobe.laptop> <20061103142140.74ecd784.ariff@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sun, 05 Nov 2006 00:43:31 -0200 Message-Id: <1162694611.2493.11.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.3 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Re: snd_hda driver for 6.1 now working X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Nov 2006 02:43:54 -0000 > Sergio, sorry, but you missed the [HEADS UP], and did it all wrong. > It is not because of the chip cannot do DMA larger than 4k. It is > because your hardware combination. Agree... in that notebook there is a problem with DMA..... the nautilus-cd-burner complains about it... > Smaller DMA means higher interrupt > rate, and your chip need to compete with other peripherals to combat > with that. All this can be solved by just using > "hint.pcm.0.buffersize=4096" without any single driver source tweak. > Note that you probably don't even need this tunable hint if you using > the above "lowlatency" (which itself need another HEADS UP) > patch/module. Thanks very much for your infomation... I will fix my installation with that patch in the /usr/src/sys directory... I tried to change the buffersize to 4096 or less but still does not worked the modules fails to run in my 6.1-RELEASE because of a call to mix_setparentchild that does not exists in the sound.ko module in the 6.1 RELEASE... so I had to comment the code too... Anyway was for me a good "exercise" watching how the module is coded ( I have much to learn from the masters, like you....) Sergio