From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Jan 20 07:22:41 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0D1016A4CF
	for <ports@FreeBSD.org>; Tue, 20 Jan 2004 07:22:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.ciam.ru (main.ciam.ru [213.147.57.66])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 644D543D1D
	for <ports@FreeBSD.org>; Tue, 20 Jan 2004 07:21:48 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from sem@ciam.ru)
Received: from sem.ciam.ru ([192.168.45.10] helo=ciam.ru)
	by mail.ciam.ru with esmtp (Exim 4.x)
	id 1AixgQ-000AcN-Db; Tue, 20 Jan 2004 18:20:50 +0300
Message-ID: <400D4763.2060000@ciam.ru>
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2004 18:21:07 +0300
From: Sergey Matveychuk <sem@ciam.ru>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US;
	rv:1.6) Gecko/20040113
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Oliver Eikemeier <eikemeier@fillmore-labs.com>
References: <1074590694.85583.20.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com>
	<400D2939.5090203@fillmore-labs.com> <400D4217.4090901@ciam.ru>
	<400D4650.1090706@fillmore-labs.com>
In-Reply-To: <400D4650.1090706@fillmore-labs.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
cc: ports@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: HEADS UP: New bsd.*.mk changes
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2004 15:22:41 -0000

Oliver Eikemeier wrote:

>> Why don't you think we could use ${PORT_DBDIR}/${PKGNAME} instead?
>> PKGNAME has no conflicts.
> 
> 
> Won't survive a version bump, which is what this is all about, I guess.

Oops! I meant PKGBASE. But now I see LATEST_LINK=PKGBASE.

-- 
Sem.