From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 27 03:28:30 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB89316A4CE; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 03:28:30 +0000 (GMT) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (CPE0050040655c8-CM00111ae02aac.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com [69.199.47.57]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65F9443D1F; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 03:28:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 9E413513A4; Sat, 26 Feb 2005 19:28:29 -0800 (PST) Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2005 19:28:29 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway To: Peter Jeremy Message-ID: <20050227032829.GA75730@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20050226071308.GN57256@cirb503493.alcatel.com.au> <20050227032315.GA96334@cirb503493.alcatel.com.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="pf9I7BMVVzbSWLtt" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050227032315.GA96334@cirb503493.alcatel.com.au> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org cc: Robert Watson cc: phk@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Excessive delays due to syncer kthread X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 03:28:30 -0000 --pf9I7BMVVzbSWLtt Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Feb 27, 2005 at 02:23:15PM +1100, Peter Jeremy wrote: > On Sat, 2005-Feb-26 11:24:26 +0000, Robert Watson wrote: > >I don't have too much insight into the syncer (I've CC'd phk to victimize > >him with more e-mail as this is an area he takes great interested in). A > >couple of questions:=20 > > > >(1) Have you tried turning on options PREEMPTION?=20 >=20 > I haven't yet. I will look at this but some of the mailing list comments > made me think it wasn't totally reliable yet. I don't think there are known problems with use of PREEMPTION on RELENG_5. Kris --pf9I7BMVVzbSWLtt Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFCIT5dWry0BWjoQKURAlDjAJ44NYSRW3UaDqmsSmSi34wLBrlD4QCgj1NF f26S4oJW7SvreH7WXV2aZ54= =ERnM -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --pf9I7BMVVzbSWLtt--