From owner-freebsd-stable  Thu Jan 23 14: 1:52 2003
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7756837B401
	for <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>; Thu, 23 Jan 2003 14:01:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ebb.errno.com (ebb.errno.com [66.127.85.87])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 017AA43F18
	for <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>; Thu, 23 Jan 2003 14:01:51 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from sam@errno.com)
Received: from melange (melange.errno.com [66.127.85.82])
	(authenticated bits=0)
	by ebb.errno.com (8.12.5/8.12.1) with ESMTP id h0NM1onN086164
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NO);
	Thu, 23 Jan 2003 14:01:50 -0800 (PST)?g
	(envelope-from sam@errno.com)œ
X-Authentication-Warning: ebb.errno.com: Host melange.errno.com [66.127.85.82] claimed to be melange
Message-ID: <12a301c2c32b$08196fd0$52557f42@errno.com>
From: "Sam Leffler" <sam@errno.com>
To: <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>, "Mike Tancsa" <mike@sentex.net>
References: <5.2.0.9.0.20030123164850.07c4cb58@marble.sentex.ca>
Subject: Re: HEADS UP: m_tag committed
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2003 14:01:49 -0800
Organization: Errno Consulting
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4807.1700
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4807.1700
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <freebsd-stable.FreeBSD.ORG>
List-Archive: <http://docs.freebsd.org/mail/> (Web Archive)
List-Help: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=help> (List Instructions)
List-Subscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=subscribe%20freebsd-stable>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=unsubscribe%20freebsd-stable>
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

> Hi,
>          Will the behaviour of the FAST_IPSEC code be any different with
> how the current IPSEC interacts with ipfw/ipfw2 and ipfilter ?
>

It should not be, but I would not be surprised if there were some issues.
So far as I can tell the code has gotten little exposure in -current so I
expect there to be some bumps.

FWIW the FAST_IPSEC code has been in production use on a small number
of -stable machines for >9 months (it was originally developed on -stable).
It's  been pounded on extensively and I believe is ready for use with IPv4
(there's no working IPv6 support just yet).

    Sam


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message