From owner-freebsd-hackers Mon Jan 12 17:14:35 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id RAA02043 for hackers-outgoing; Mon, 12 Jan 1998 17:14:35 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from etinc.com ([207.252.1.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id RAA02021 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 1998 17:14:15 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dennis@etinc.com) Received: from dbsys.etinc.com (dbsys.etinc.com [207.252.1.18] (may be forged)) by etinc.com (8.8.7/8.6.9) with SMTP id UAA08373; Mon, 12 Jan 1998 20:15:26 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <3.0.32.19980112201715.00a43cb0@etinc.com> X-Sender: dennis@etinc.com X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Pro Version 3.0 (32) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 1998 20:17:15 -0500 To: Eivind Eklund From: dennis Subject: Re: FreeBSD Netcards Cc: Tom , Jamie Bowden , hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk At 10:38 PM 1/12/98 +0100, Eivind Eklund wrote: >dennis writes: > >> > This is raw socket stuff is interesting. Example source please. I >> >don't believe this problem exists anymore. I know that Julian fixed >> >problems with routing sockets. As a side point, routing sockets and raw >> >sockets can only be accessed by root processes. >> >> Just look in raw_usrreq(). the default case is a panic. > >Fixed in revision 1.12 as of April 27, 1997. > >Do you have anything else? (I don't think any of us want panic()s to >occur for userland errors, though I think they often are the correct >path for a kernel error.) 2.2.5-RELEASE is shipped with v1.8 which is dated 3/11/96, so something is amiss. If it takes a year for these fixes to make it into a release it doesnt do anyone any good... dennis