From owner-freebsd-current Sun Mar 23 13:21:55 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id NAA29759 for current-outgoing; Sun, 23 Mar 1997 13:21:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from phaeton.artisoft.com (phaeton.Artisoft.COM [198.17.250.50]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id NAA29754 for ; Sun, 23 Mar 1997 13:21:51 -0800 (PST) Received: (from terry@localhost) by phaeton.artisoft.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) id OAA21046; Sun, 23 Mar 1997 14:09:16 -0700 From: Terry Lambert Message-Id: <199703232109.OAA21046@phaeton.artisoft.com> Subject: Re: 2.2R (src 2.2 211): == dialing To: joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de Date: Sun, 23 Mar 1997 14:09:16 -0700 (MST) Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <19970323210136.BJ32077@uriah.heep.sax.de> from "J Wunsch" at Mar 23, 97 09:01:36 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-current@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > > I happen to disagree with the BSD interpretation of POSIX in this > > regard. SVR4 is certified POSIX compliant, and they don't do what > > we do: they propagate group SIGHUP to all process group members. > > They don't do it in the kernel, their shell does. If you want the > same silly behaviour, use the same shell (ksh93e, it's available for > free). I don't want it, so i'm using this shell for reference > purposes only. This isn't true. I've been hacking SysV kernels since *way* back, and they handle it in the kernel. If the shell does this, then the shell is probably wrong. Terry Lambert terry@lambert.org --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers.