Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 30 Dec 1998 12:36:31 +1030 (CST)
From:      Kris Kennaway <kkennawa@physics.adelaide.edu.au>
To:        ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Policy on bzip2?
Message-ID:  <Pine.OSF.4.05.9812301231220.2157-100000@bragg>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Is there a policy on when it's good to use bzipped distfiles (which are
usually much smaller than their gzipped counterparts)? For those of us with
slow network links, the extra ~30% compression is extremely handy (not to
mention better for conserving bandwidth on the net generally). Lots of folks
are jumping on the bandwagon and providing their tars in bzipped form (as well
as gzipped), so this seems likely to only increase in the future.

Are there any reasons NOT to use bzippped distfiles where they're available?

Kris

-----
(ASP) Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) announced today that the release of its 
productivity suite, Office 2000, will be delayed until the first quarter
of 1901.


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.OSF.4.05.9812301231220.2157-100000>