From owner-freebsd-ports Sat Dec 6 09:25:10 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id JAA01485 for ports-outgoing; Sat, 6 Dec 1997 09:25:10 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-ports) Received: from rover.village.org (rover.village.org [204.144.255.49]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id JAA01466 for ; Sat, 6 Dec 1997 09:24:59 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from imp@village.org) Received: from harmony [10.0.0.6] by rover.village.org with esmtp (Exim 1.71 #1) id 0xeNxz-00029s-00; Sat, 6 Dec 1997 10:24:35 -0700 Received: from harmony.village.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.8.8/8.8.3) with ESMTP id KAA18629; Sat, 6 Dec 1997 10:23:35 -0700 (MST) Message-Id: <199712061723.KAA18629@harmony.village.org> To: Gary Kline Subject: Re: 3.0 -release ? Cc: ports@freebsd.org In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 06 Dec 1997 00:10:14 PST." <199712060810.AAA20945@tao.thought.org> References: <199712060810.AAA20945@tao.thought.org> Date: Sat, 06 Dec 1997 10:23:34 -0700 From: Warner Losh Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk In message <199712060810.AAA20945@tao.thought.org> Gary Kline writes: : If there are fewer than 10 gotchas, a merger still makes : sense to me. If OpenBSD is too different from FreeBSD, : NetBSD shouldn't be. shouldn't be a big deal. however, in practice it turns out to be a big deal. there are at least 100 gotchas. everything from some ports assuming i386, to missing libraries, to differences in how man pages are stored, to ... well you get the idea. there is more hair here than meets the eye. Warner