From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 16 03:08:39 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A416316A4CE for ; Mon, 16 Feb 2004 03:08:39 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.owt.com (smtp.owt.com [204.118.6.19]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 619A043D1D for ; Mon, 16 Feb 2004 03:08:39 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kstewart@owt.com) Received: from localhost.invalid (owt-207-41-94-233.owt.com [207.41.94.233]) by smtp.owt.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i1GB8K9U000567; Mon, 16 Feb 2004 03:08:20 -0800 From: Kent Stewart To: "Spades" Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2004 03:08:37 -0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.6 References: <030201c3f287$ba2f61c0$fa10fea9@bryanuptrvb0jc> <200402131746.44940.kstewart@owt.com> <009301c3f47c$8322bdc0$fa10fea9@bryanuptrvb0jc> In-Reply-To: <009301c3f47c$8322bdc0$fa10fea9@bryanuptrvb0jc> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200402160308.37488.kstewart@owt.com> cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 5.x stable cvsup X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2004 11:08:39 -0000 On Monday 16 February 2004 03:03 am, Spades wrote: > Thanks, but /usr/src/UPDATING doesn't exist > > spank# ls /usr/src > crypto kerberos5 secure > spank# uname -a > FreeBSD spank 5.1-RELEASE FreeBSD 5.1-RELEASE #0: Thu Jun 5 02:55:42 > GMT 2003 root@wv1u.btc.adaptec.com:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC > i386 > > Hmm? I had that happen when I had a -s option on my cvsup command line. I rm'ed /usr/src and cvsup only updated what it thought had changed. Kent > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Kent Stewart" > To: ; "Spades" > Sent: Saturday, February 14, 2004 9:46 AM > Subject: Re: 5.x stable cvsup > > > On Friday 13 February 2004 03:18 pm, Spades wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > I got a question, my dedicated server provider has installed > > > 5.1-Release and refuses to install 4.7 for me. Can I recompile to > > > 5.1-STABLE using the same method as 4.7 and same > > > 4.x-stable-supfile and kernel config file. > > > > The accepted technique is in /usr/src/UPDATING just like it is in > > 4.x. There are a few things different but the buildworld, > > build[install]kernel, installworld method is used on both branches. > > > > I think 4.7 has been EOLed, i.e., no bug fixes or security fixes. I > > wouldn't want one on my local network. > > > > > OR do i need to use a 5,x-stable method? any idea any url > > > i can find help in compiling 5.1-REL to STABLE. > > > > There isn't a 5.x-stable. You probably won't see that until > > 5.3-stable. > > > > Kent > > > > -- > > Kent Stewart > > Richland, WA > > > > http://users.owt.com/kstewart/index.html > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" -- Kent Stewart Richland, WA http://users.owt.com/kstewart/index.html