Date: Tue, 14 Sep 1999 14:56:13 -0700 From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@zippy.cdrom.com> To: Brett Glass <brett@lariat.org> Cc: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@zippy.cdrom.com>, Jonathan Lemon <jlemon@americantv.com>, chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: FreeBSD Distributions: Leveling the playing field Message-ID: <84065.937346173@localhost> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 14 Sep 1999 14:06:24 MDT." <4.2.0.58.19990914140446.04b44100@localhost>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> How about if the user is given the option of which installer to use? > Use of the new installer would not be a requirement but rather a third- > party option, and clearly labeled as such. Would this work? Assuming that it was very clearly labelled, I can't see any problems with that. Of course, you could also take this to the extreme and cause the entire distribution to be wildly divergent again by adding extra options at every turn, but I'm assuming you're not talking about anything like that. - Jordan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?84065.937346173>