From owner-freebsd-arch Wed Jun 28 8: 9:22 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from flood.ping.uio.no (flood.ping.uio.no [129.240.78.31]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6639637BAE5 for ; Wed, 28 Jun 2000 08:09:11 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from des@flood.ping.uio.no) Received: (from des@localhost) by flood.ping.uio.no (8.9.3/8.9.3) id RAA12273; Wed, 28 Jun 2000 17:09:09 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from des@flood.ping.uio.no) To: Jesper Skriver Cc: Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group , freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Soft updates mount change (17 Jun) References: <200006272212.PAA36120@passer.osg.gov.bc.ca> <20000628094841.D77839@skriver.dk> From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav Date: 28 Jun 2000 17:09:07 +0200 In-Reply-To: Jesper Skriver's message of "Wed, 28 Jun 2000 09:48:41 +0200" Message-ID: Lines: 13 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0802 (Gnus v5.8.2) Emacs/20.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Jesper Skriver writes: > On Tue, Jun 27, 2000 at 03:12:07PM -0700, Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group wrote: > > Would we be interested in doing this? > It has been discussed several times over the last week or so, and Kirk > had good arguments for not doing it - the mail archive is your friend. s/week/year/. This has been discussed many times, and while the current solution (fs flag) is not particularly elegant, it is the lesser evil. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@flood.ping.uio.no To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message