From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 10 16:08:58 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A15DF16A4CE for ; Thu, 10 Mar 2005 16:08:58 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.crypta.net (mail.crypta.net [83.136.131.3]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A53243D55 for ; Thu, 10 Mar 2005 16:08:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ah@crypta.net) Received: by mail.crypta.net (cryptobank/eProtect-smtpd, from userid 1001) id 86294ECD425; Thu, 10 Mar 2005 17:08:53 +0100 (CET) Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 17:08:53 +0100 From: Andy Hilker To: Denis Shaposhnikov Message-ID: <20050310160852.GB1718@mail.crypta.net> References: <200503091838.06322.mi+mx@aldan.algebra.com> <20050310004919.GA34206@hub.freebsd.org> <87ll8vn32j.fsf@neva.vlink.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87ll8vn32j.fsf@neva.vlink.ru> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-PGP-Key: http://wwwkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xEC6E1071 X-PGP-Fingerprint: 9B2E 5892 AD93 D5C5 FB8E 3912 35D6 951B EC6E 1071 Organization: cryptobank - Andy Hilker cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: the current status of nullfs, unionfs X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 16:08:58 -0000 Hi, You (Denis Shaposhnikov) wrote: > >>>>> "Kris" == Kris Kennaway writes: > > Kris> nullfs seems to work fine, unionfs is very fragile and easily > Kris> exploded. > > nullfs is absolutely useless for jail's because TOO slow. What do you mean exactly, how do you benchmark this? bye, Andy