From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 11 15:31:29 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: FreeBSD-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B69BC16A41B for ; Mon, 11 Feb 2008 15:31:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from oceanare@pacific.net.sg) Received: from smtpgate2.pacific.net.sg (smtpgate2.pacific.net.sg [203.120.90.32]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E93DD13C458 for ; Mon, 11 Feb 2008 15:31:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from oceanare@pacific.net.sg) Received: (qmail 25468 invoked from network); 11 Feb 2008 15:31:26 -0000 Received: from adsl246.dyn234.pacific.net.sg (HELO P2120.somewherefaraway.com) (oceanare@210.24.234.246) by smtpgate2.pacific.net.sg with ESMTPA; 11 Feb 2008 15:31:26 -0000 Message-ID: <47B06A39.7090708@pacific.net.sg> Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 23:31:05 +0800 From: Erich Dollansky User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20070826) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: =?UTF-8?B?Tmlrb2xhIExlxI1pxIc=?= References: <47AFC80B.8090303@gmail.com> <47B05924.5000405@cs.okstate.edu> <47B05C7A.80602@pacific.net.sg> <200802111540.34420.wundram@beenic.net> <20080211161507.6e82fbd4@anthesphoria.net> In-Reply-To: <20080211161507.6e82fbd4@anthesphoria.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: "Heiko Wundram \(Beenic\)" , FreeBSD-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: what happened to linuxflashplugin? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 15:31:29 -0000 Hi, Nikola Le=C4=8Di=C4=87 wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: RIPEMD160 >=20 > On Mon, 11 Feb 2008 15:40:34 +0100 > "Heiko Wundram (Beenic)" wrote: > =20 >> This is another reason why Flash is bad, bad, bad. Am I repeating >> myself? this is known. I mean, it is known that Flash is bad. >=20 > Agree here, but "open-source friendly" companies that promote the use > of flash are much worse. As it seems to be, the reason why people want > to use flash on FreeBSD is youtube in most of cases. YouTube? Isn't the right spelling YouPorn? Erich