Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2020 21:21:38 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: python@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 243497] math/py-numpy: Fails to build with OpenBlas Message-ID: <bug-243497-21822-ldob5lJLYX@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-243497-21822@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-243497-21822@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D243497 --- Comment #27 from John Hein <jcfyecrayz@liamekaens.com> --- Created attachment 210997 --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3D210997&action= =3Dedit [patch] add openblas to list of cblas compatible libs to check (In reply to John Hein from comment #26) Here's a patch to add openblas to the list of cblas compatible libs (also includes Roland's patch to catch the linker error in the outer catch). It looks like newer versions of upstream don't have the same 'have_cblas' t= est, and does search all the configured libraries (and will catch the linker err= or). So we probably won't need to carry on either patch after updating numpy. Note: numpy 1.16 is the last to support python2.7, I think. If we need the python2.7 version of numpy around a bit longer (friendly to the many users still working on updating to python3), maybe a repocopy to math/py-numpy-1.= 16 is warranted. If so, I wouldn't spend any time allowing them (old and new numpy) to be concurrently installed since it would just be a stop gap until python2.7 is officially out of the tree. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-243497-21822-ldob5lJLYX>