Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2007 22:58:20 -0700 From: Wes Peters <wes@opensail.org> To: Daniel O'Connor <doconnor@gsoft.com.au> Cc: Erik Trulsson <ertr1013@student.uu.se>, src-committers@freebsd.org, cvs-src@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org, Jack Vogel <jfvogel@gmail.com>, Jack F Vogel <jfv@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/conf files kern.pre.mk src/sys/dev/em LICENSE e1000_80003es2lan.c e1000_80003es2lan.h e1000_82540.c e1000_82541.c e1000_82541.h e1000_82542.c e1000_82543.c e1000_82543.h e1000_82571.c e1000_82571.h e1000_82575.c ... Message-ID: <1C42C21C-0E6D-4C8F-82A4-336924D9AA5D@opensail.org> In-Reply-To: <200710061535.02201.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> References: <200710052249.l95Mn9Nb071852@repoman.freebsd.org> <2a41acea0710051705l217224b6vc705dc6139b94e3b@mail.gmail.com> <20071006004634.GA24962@owl.midgard.homeip.net> <200710061535.02201.doconnor@gsoft.com.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Oct 5, 2007, at 11:04 PM, Daniel O'Connor wrote: > On Sat, 6 Oct 2007, Erik Trulsson wrote: >> As I understand it the policy of FreeBSD is that new stuff *always* >> should go into -CURRENT first before it is allowed to go into any >> -STABLE branch. >> >> Please see >> http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/committers-guide/ >> rules.html > > The rules don't actually say that.. And the rules aren't a substitute for exercising common sense, which is what Jack has done here. > It looks like a good reason to me but only re@ & core@'s opinions > really > count here :) I count? Who'd a thunk it? By the way, Jack, I too appreciate your support and hard work. We use Intel ethernet devices exclusively in our products at work, because they "just work." In FreeBSD, that's largely due to you. -- Where am I, and what am I doing in this handbasket? Wes Peters wes@softweyr.com
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1C42C21C-0E6D-4C8F-82A4-336924D9AA5D>