From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 10 17:24:07 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86D7B16A41F for ; Wed, 10 Aug 2005 17:24:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sos@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from spider.deepcore.dk (cpe.atm2-0-53484.0x50a6c9a6.abnxx9.customer.tele.dk [80.166.201.166]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC5F343D48 for ; Wed, 10 Aug 2005 17:24:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sos@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from [194.192.25.136] (mac.deepcore.dk [194.192.25.136]) by spider.deepcore.dk (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j7AH9ieY071475; Wed, 10 Aug 2005 19:09:44 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from sos@FreeBSD.ORG) In-Reply-To: <790a9fff0508100844a7e5435@mail.gmail.com> References: <42F7F7E8.1020507@mail.uni-mainz.de> <42F9009E.3030601@mac.com> <42F9609E.1010207@goldsword.com> <20050810023111.GA2913@FS.denninger.net> <20050810024618.GA8198@drjekyll.mkbuelow.net> <6.2.1.2.0.20050810081251.05298ff0@64.7.153.2> <20050810133159.GA10150@FS.denninger.net> <6.2.1.2.0.20050810094204.06c46098@64.7.153.2> <20050810144148.GB10150@FS.denninger.net> <790a9fff0508100844a7e5435@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v733) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <4A1BF8DF-EC50-4067-A69B-84D9BE5B22C7@FreeBSD.ORG> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?S=F8ren_Schmidt?= Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2005 19:24:01 +0200 To: Scot Hetzel X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.733) X-mail-scanned: by DeepCore Virus & Spam killer v1.12 Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ad10: WARNING - READ_DMA UDMA ICRC error (retrying request) LBA=11441599 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2005 17:24:07 -0000 On 10/08/2005, at 17:44, Scot Hetzel wrote: > On 8/10/05, Karl Denninger wrote: > >> On Wed, Aug 10, 2005 at 09:51:03AM -0400, Mike Tancsa wrote: >> >>> At 09:31 AM 10/08/2005, Karl Denninger wrote: >>> >>> >>>> Also, I've yet to see a developer commit on the list that they =20 >>>> WILL fix it >>>> if >>>> such a controller board is forthcoming (and will return the =20 >>>> board when >>>> they're >>>> done) - I've got two of these cards here (choose between Adaptec =20= >>>> and >>>> Bustek) >>>> and would be happy to UPS one to someone IF I had a firm =20 >>>> commitment that >>>> 6.x >>>> would NOT go out without this being addressed and that the board =20= >>>> would be >>>> returned to me when work was complete. >>>> >>> >>> You demand to see support for this chipset fixed, yet, you cant =20 >>> pony up a >>> measly hundred bucks to donate the card to the developer who is =20 >>> not being >>> paid to develop anything. >>> >>> ---Mike >>> >> >> I have "demanded" nothing Mike. >> >> > I agree Mike's wording was a little strong, but we have seen you > request strongly that some one fix this problem. > > Have you contacted S=F8ren, to see if he has the troublesome hardware? > > Also contact S=F8ren directly with your offer to supply a troublesome > board, and/or access to a system that displays the problem. More than > likely he would agree to return the board once he has a proper fix for > the problem. Since I came in late in this, I need to know what kind of controller =20 we are talking about, and if the problem is still present in 6.0. I plan to backport ATA from 6.0 to 5-stable when it has settled, so =20 6.0 is the one and only (pre)release to test with and get back to me =20 with the result. - S=F8ren