Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2001 21:52:07 +0200 From: Wilko Bulte <wkb@freebie.demon.nl> To: Leif Neland <leifn@neland.dk> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [RFC] RELNOTESng for 5-CURRENT Message-ID: <20010425215207.A929@freebie.demon.nl> In-Reply-To: <03f001c0cdbf$d6257300$6405a8c0@neland.dk>; from leifn@neland.dk on Wed, Apr 25, 2001 at 09:42:07PM %2B0200 References: <200104241603.f3OG3AB06290@bmah-freebsd-0.cisco.com> <Pine.BSF.4.21.0104250050530.10183-100000@takhus.dyn.mind.net> <20010425211805N.matusita@jp.FreeBSD.org> <200104251658.f3PGwe220619@bmah-freebsd-0.cisco.com> <20010425202204.A1311@freebie.demon.nl> <03f001c0cdbf$d6257300$6405a8c0@neland.dk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Apr 25, 2001 at 09:42:07PM +0200, Leif Neland wrote: > > > > > > Here's my thoughts...for the record, I'm weakly opposed to regen-ing > > > *.TXT versions: First, I don't want to bloat the repository with oodles > > > of builds to the *.TXT files. If we do this, it ought to be be fairly > > > infrequently, like maybe once or twice a month. > > > > Bad idea.. > > > > RELNOTES, HARDWARE etc are things that should be up to date. Not > > 'a bit uptodate' or 'slightly outdated'. > > > > I really would not like to see the idea being bloated by going this route. > > > As UPDATING may contain information nessecary to run make world, it can't be built by make world. > Chicken and egg, methinks... Possibly. But I was not refering to UPDATING. -- | / o / / _ Arnhem, The Netherlands email: wilko@freebsd.org |/|/ / / /( (_) Bulte Powered by FreeBSD/alpha http://www.freebsd.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010425215207.A929>