From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 4 15:05:51 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACF9416A419 for ; Thu, 4 Oct 2007 15:05:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dudu@dudu.ro) Received: from fk-out-0910.google.com (fk-out-0910.google.com [209.85.128.184]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48FF813C465 for ; Thu, 4 Oct 2007 15:05:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dudu@dudu.ro) Received: by fk-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id b27so202011fka for ; Thu, 04 Oct 2007 08:05:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.82.154.12 with SMTP id b12mr17392992bue.1191510349452; Thu, 04 Oct 2007 08:05:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.82.148.14 with HTTP; Thu, 4 Oct 2007 08:05:49 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2007 18:05:49 +0300 From: "Vlad GALU" To: "Giorgos Keramidas" In-Reply-To: <20071004144315.GA6377@kobe.laptop> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <001f01c80407$1358d490$b6db87d4@multiplay.co.uk> <012101c804e5$efa7e9c0$b6db87d4@multiplay.co.uk> <86abr1yb68.fsf@ds4.des.no> <86641pyanc.fsf@ds4.des.no> <86wsu5wuz3.fsf@ds4.des.no> <20071004144315.GA6377@kobe.laptop> Cc: Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav , gepu@flow.rdsnet.ro, Steven Hartland , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How to enable more than 256 pty's? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Oct 2007 15:05:51 -0000 On 10/4/07, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: > On 2007-10-02 15:41, Vlad GALU wrote: > > On 10/2/07, Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav wrote: > > > "Vlad GALU" writes: > > > > The symptoms were exhibited even with rev. 1.16. I've CC'ed him so > > > > he can catch up with the thread. > > > > > > Which symptoms? I can no longer reproduce the hang-on-close bug. > > > > Strangely enough, me neither. In his case, allocated pts' wouldn't > > get deallocated once the sessions ended. > > There was an old bug, which caused pts consumers to get stuck in > "devdrn". This has been fixed, AFAICT, a long time ago. At least, I > can't reproduce it any more with the usual tests: > > * Closing xterm windows. > > * Closing telnet sessions. > > * Exiting from screen(1) windows. > Weird. 3 people on this thread already saw the symptoms :( > -- If it's there, and you can see it, it's real. If it's not there, and you can see it, it's virtual. If it's there, and you can't see it, it's transparent. If it's not there, and you can't see it, you erased it.