Date: Mon, 23 Mar 1998 11:36:01 -0700 (MST) From: Marc Slemko <marcs@znep.com> To: Mike Smith <mike@smith.net.au> Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: a possibly interesting article... Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.95.980323112906.231d-100000@alive.znep.com> In-Reply-To: <199803231744.JAA13231@dingo.cdrom.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
(followups probably better directed to chat...) On Mon, 23 Mar 1998, Mike Smith wrote: > What's most amusing to me is that they require this obscene pile of > garbage to put out a measly 350GB/day. > > Wcarchive does about 250GB with a single P6. 8) That is not a fair comparison. Dynamic content is very different than static content. Microsoft does an awful lot of dynamic content on their website, sometimes for no apparent reason. wcarchive does very little dynamic content from what I would guess. I'm not claiming that NT isn't horrible and doesn't require more hardware, especially to make it stable, but this particular comparison really isn't too meaningful. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.95.980323112906.231d-100000>