From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 30 18:55:48 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0F2A106568B for ; Tue, 30 Sep 2008 18:55:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [IPv6:2001:4070:101:2::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C54F18FC23 for ; Tue, 30 Sep 2008 18:55:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m8UItbks020052; Tue, 30 Sep 2008 20:55:37 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.2/8.14.2/Submit) with ESMTP id m8UIta9q020049; Tue, 30 Sep 2008 20:55:37 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2008 20:55:36 +0200 (CEST) From: Wojciech Puchar To: Danny Do In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20080930205435.B20033@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> References: <1222681181.48e0a25d094c3@www.inbox.lv> <48E21C66.8080407@FreeBSD.org> <20080930161407.E16761@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: Optimal File System config for 2.5TB RAID5 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2008 18:55:49 -0000 > > The reason I want to use hardware RAID is because I got so much problem with > software RAID5 4 years ago on FreeBSD 5.4. I still remember those > nightmares. Furthermore, hardware RAID5 doesn't require much knowledge and > management. > > But you could be right, the CPU speed is triple now, software RAID gets > smarter and more stable, it could perform better than hardware RAID because > it's more flexible. But again, I still prefer hardware because it's easy to it's someone more than that, still - you don't read my mails carefully. you will get better performance with my patch, but still it will be crappy with your "hardware" RAIDs compared to what it should be