Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2013 00:04:00 -0700 From: Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org> To: Andre Oppermann <andre@freebsd.org> Cc: src-committers@freebsd.org, svn-src-user@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r249365 - in user/andre/tcp-ao/sys: conf crypto crypto/cmac crypto/hmac crypto/rijndael Message-ID: <CAJ-VmonY4veTpX0j93NSJFt71fZXTxrt5KtEByb6wsUpO7Z3iQ@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <5167A5DA.7050109@freebsd.org> References: <201304111555.r3BFtq0g019604@svn.freebsd.org> <CAJ-Vmo=yjY=hrJabjcHnR%2BA5bzHyWXC%2BYsU4bzC2BDY88T79=w@mail.gmail.com> <5167A5DA.7050109@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 11 April 2013 23:12, Andre Oppermann <andre@freebsd.org> wrote: > I don't know yet. It's still some time until the code is > fully functional and tested. At runtime it wont have any > impact until an application installs the first key on a > tcp socket. I'm more worried about kernel size footprint with new features. I may not want this enabled on some of the tiny embedded platforms. Much like how I can't fit IPv6 into them at the present. :( Thanks, Adrian
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAJ-VmonY4veTpX0j93NSJFt71fZXTxrt5KtEByb6wsUpO7Z3iQ>