From owner-freebsd-questions Thu Sep 28 08:54:22 1995 Return-Path: owner-questions Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id IAA18489 for questions-outgoing; Thu, 28 Sep 1995 08:54:22 -0700 Received: from txcc.net ([205.218.183.157]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with ESMTP id IAA18479 for ; Thu, 28 Sep 1995 08:54:15 -0700 Received: (from litteken@localhost) by txcc.net (8.6.11/8.6.9) id KAA00425; Thu, 28 Sep 1995 10:54:14 -0500 Date: Thu, 28 Sep 1995 10:54:13 -0500 (CDT) From: Todd Litteken To: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: STILL faulting.. In-Reply-To: <199509280948.TAA22049@genesis.atrad.adelaide.edu.au> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-questions@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk On Thu, 28 Sep 1995, Michael Smith wrote: > Jason T. Nelson stands accused of saying: > > > > I got the recent 2.1.0 snapshot as Justin requested, but I'm still having > > some problems (though not as much!). /usr/libexec/cc1 died once of signal > > 11, then after I continued the kernel compile, the kernel paniced for the > > same reason as before: "page fault while in kernel mode". Perhaps there > > are still problems with the 294x support? > > No. You _undoubtedly_ have a hardware problem, most likely faulty RAM > or cache, possibly motherboard or PCI configuration. > > > Jason T. Nelson > > -- I dont beleve you can say it is hardware.. I was getting page falts also.. Thay wernt bad tell i tried compiling the 2.1 src.. then it was every couple of min. it would falt.. I ran the ram through a test box and put the system through a full diag.. there is no hardware problems with mine.. then after the upgrade the falts stoped.. Also not that thay started showing up when i increased my max proc to 128.. l8r Litteken