From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jul 15 04:07:55 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AE8B16A4DE for ; Sat, 15 Jul 2006 04:07:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jrhett@mail.meer.net) Received: from outbound0.sv.meer.net (outbound0.mx.meer.net [209.157.153.23]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B411F43D45 for ; Sat, 15 Jul 2006 04:07:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jrhett@mail.meer.net) Received: from mail.meer.net (mail.meer.net [209.157.152.14]) by outbound0.sv.meer.net (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id k6F479j6046644; Fri, 14 Jul 2006 21:07:54 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jrhett@mail.meer.net) Received: from mail.meer.net (mail.meer.net [209.157.152.14]) by mail.meer.net (8.13.3/8.13.3/meer) with ESMTP id k6F475jW034155; Fri, 14 Jul 2006 21:07:05 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jrhett@mail.meer.net) Received: (from jrhett@localhost) by mail.meer.net (8.13.3/8.13.3) id k6F475cE034154; Fri, 14 Jul 2006 21:07:05 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jrhett) Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2006 21:07:05 -0700 From: Jo Rhett To: Mark Linimon Message-ID: <20060715040705.GF33499@svcolo.com> Mail-Followup-To: Mark Linimon , freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org References: <200605050000.k4500blB001868@freefall.freebsd.org> <20060505014315.GB22804@soaustin.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060505014315.GB22804@soaustin.net> Organization: svcolo.com User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Cc: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/95708: freebsd startup script for sec port X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 15 Jul 2006 04:07:55 -0000 > On 04/05/2006, Jo Rhett wrote: > > I'm highly amused that I would be asked to make some changes, when > > the request for said changes requires more typing than making the > > changes. This is what, 41 characters different? On Thu, May 04, 2006 at 08:43:15PM -0500, Mark Linimon wrote: > Some maintainers object, vociferously, to any change made to their ports > without their approval. Therefore, the default policy is that maintainers > need to be asked, because it is too difficult to remember which maintainers > will complain and which won't. This is a classical case of "damned if you > do, damned if you don't." I'm not certain we're talking about the same thing. Bouncing a patch back to me for a 12-character replacement seemed silly. -- Jo Rhett senior geek SVcolo : Silicon Valley Colocation