Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2002 14:37:55 +0000 From: Mark Murray <mark@grondar.za> To: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au> Cc: arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Why isn't __progname declared in a header? Message-ID: <200203241437.g2OEbuXl083121@grimreaper.grondar.org> In-Reply-To: <20020325001528.B44805-100000@gamplex.bde.org> ; from Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au> "Mon, 25 Mar 2002 00:24:47 %2B1100." References: <20020325001528.B44805-100000@gamplex.bde.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> On Sun, 24 Mar 2002, Mark Murray wrote: > > > __progname is (inconsistently) declared all over the place. Why is > > this not in a header? > > Because all over the place is unwarrantedly chummy with the implementation. > __progname should only be used in csu/*/crt1.c, getprogname(3), > setprogname(3) and perhaps in other parts of the implementation. OK, I've fixed that in src/lib/lib* > > Next question, what header should it go into? I'm quite happy to do > > the work. > > libc/include/libc_private.h is almost right. Hmm. It is implemented in csu/*/crt[01].c, so how about csu/common/_progname.h? M -- o Mark Murray \_ O.\_ Warning: this .sig is umop ap!sdn To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200203241437.g2OEbuXl083121>