Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 07:44:18 -0600 From: Scott Long <scottl@samsco.org> To: John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> Cc: src-committers@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, Attilio Rao <attilio@freebsd.org>, svn-src-head@freebsd.org, rwatson@freebsd.org, Kostik Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com>, "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> Subject: Re: svn commit: r192535 - head/sys/kern Message-ID: <4A16AC32.2040507@samsco.org> In-Reply-To: <200905220921.34785.jhb@freebsd.org> References: <3bbf2fe10905210629p46c7a204v6863aaba77354462@mail.gmail.com> <20090521194243.GW1927@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <3bbf2fe10905211511g53defb6cmac45fc2469cc64f@mail.gmail.com> <200905220921.34785.jhb@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
John Baldwin wrote: > On Thursday 21 May 2009 6:11:02 pm Attilio Rao wrote: >> At this point I wonder what's the purpose of maintaining the sleeping >> version for such functions? > > Actually, I still very much do not like using M_NOWAIT needlessly. I would > much rather the solution for make_dev() be that the 1 or 2 places that need > to do it with a mutex held instead queue a task to do the actual make_dev() > in a taskqueue when no locks are held. This is basically what > destroy_dev_sched() is doing. Perhaps a make_dev_sched() with a similar > callback to be called on completion would be better. Having a device driver > do all the work to setup the hardware only to fail to create a node in /dev > so that userland can actually use it is pretty rediculous and useless. > It's a lot easier for me to handle a failure of make_dev in CAM than it is to decouple the call to it. Please don't dictate policy. Scott
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4A16AC32.2040507>