From owner-freebsd-arch Sat Jan 20 20:10:17 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from flood.ping.uio.no (flood.ping.uio.no [129.240.78.31]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D247C37B401 for ; Sat, 20 Jan 2001 20:09:59 -0800 (PST) Received: (from des@localhost) by flood.ping.uio.no (8.9.3/8.9.3) id FAA63533; Sun, 21 Jan 2001 05:09:56 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from des@ofug.org) X-URL: http://www.ofug.org/~des/ X-Disclaimer: The views expressed in this message do not necessarily coincide with those of any organisation or company with which I am or have been affiliated. To: Jason Evans Cc: arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: First vm_zone patch References: <20010120124200.O69199@canonware.com> <20010120194641.Q69199@canonware.com> From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav Date: 21 Jan 2001 05:09:55 +0100 In-Reply-To: Dag-Erling Smorgrav's message of "21 Jan 2001 05:07:24 +0100" Message-ID: Lines: 15 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0802 (Gnus v5.8.2) Emacs/20.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Dag-Erling Smorgrav writes: > Jason Evans writes: > > No, I just wanted to let you know that I have some patches that touch the > > same code. My only changes are to convert the simplelocks to mutexes, so > > your work is still of additional value. > Are those patches available on freefall? Stupid question - I found them within a minute of asking. Your vm_zone.c patch is a subset of the changes I had in mind, I can handle that much of a conflict if you commit your patch in the not-to-far future. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message