From owner-freebsd-chromium@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Aug 28 22:52:00 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-chromium@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: chromium@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 37427F32;
 Thu, 28 Aug 2014 22:52:00 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from odin.blazingdot.com (odin.blazingdot.com [204.109.60.170])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A38E1D3C;
 Thu, 28 Aug 2014 22:51:59 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by odin.blazingdot.com (Postfix, from userid 1001)
 id C96D2130CCD; Thu, 28 Aug 2014 18:51:53 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2014 18:51:53 -0400
From: Marcus Reid <marcus@blazingdot.com>
To: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: [Bug 192821] www/chromium crashes when signing into chrome
Message-ID: <20140828225153.GA85446@blazingdot.com>
References: <bug-192821-28929@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
 <bug-192821-28929-9Sf86i7zom@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <bug-192821-28929-9Sf86i7zom@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
X-Coffee-Level: nearly-fatal
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Cc: chromium@FreeBSD.org
X-BeenThere: freebsd-chromium@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1
Precedence: list
List-Id: FreeBSD-specific Chromium issues <freebsd-chromium.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-chromium>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-chromium-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-chromium/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-chromium@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-chromium-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-chromium>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-chromium-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2014 22:52:00 -0000

Hi,

What is the rationale for using external ports instead of bundled
versions?  I understand that for example, the bundled OpenSSL has a
number of Google patches.  I'd rather have a Chromium with less bugs
than save a little disk space.

Marcus