From owner-freebsd-questions Mon Jan 4 08:40:47 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id IAA03625 for freebsd-questions-outgoing; Mon, 4 Jan 1999 08:40:47 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from gateway.sitel.net ([206.24.48.67]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id IAA03619 for ; Mon, 4 Jan 1999 08:40:40 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jsw@cywub.sitel.net) Received: from dns3.sitel.net by gateway.sitel.net via smtpd (for hub.FreeBSD.ORG [204.216.27.18]) with SMTP; 4 Jan 1999 16:40:15 UT Received: from dev2.sitel.net (mail1.sitel.net [10.252.249.17]) by www.sitel.net (8.6.11/8.6.6) with ESMTP id KAA15847; Mon, 4 Jan 1999 10:37:41 -0600 Message-Id: <199901041637.QAA29532@cywub.sitel.com> Subject: Re: SCO Unix vrs. FreeBSD To: quintin@smlt.com (Quintin Oliver) Date: Mon, 4 Jan 1999 10:37:36 -0600 (CST) From: Jack Winslade Cc: jsw@cywub.sitel.net, freebsd@netsys.hn, freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: from "Quintin Oliver" at Jan 4, 99 04:56:13 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL20] Content-Type: text Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > Is there a "shareware" copy available for SCO UNIX? just that I'll like to > get to know it better, many other ISP's in our area run it and I'll like > to give it a try, funny thing though, they were quite busy at Christmas > :-)) LOL! SCO has the reputation of being somewhat unstable. In all fairness to SCO, I think lots of this has to do with the customer's misconfiguration. I've seen many SCO installations that were unstable, but were improved significantly by doing some simple kernel tweaking, especially in the network area. Good day JSW To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message