From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Oct 12 23:30:14 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B9DA16A4D1
	for <ports@FreeBSD.org>; Tue, 12 Oct 2004 23:30:14 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from fillmore.dyndns.org (port-212-202-50-234.dynamic.qsc.de
	[212.202.50.234])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C250C43D31
	for <ports@FreeBSD.org>; Tue, 12 Oct 2004 23:30:13 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from eikemeier@fillmore-labs.com)
Received: from dhcp-11.local ([172.16.0.11] helo=dhcp-12.local)
	by fillmore.dyndns.org with esmtps (TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168)
	(Exim 4.43 (FreeBSD))
	id 1CHW5q-0000YQ-3N; Wed, 13 Oct 2004 01:30:12 +0200
Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2004 01:30:23 +0200
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v482)
To: Chuck Swiger <cswiger@mac.com>
From: Oliver Eikemeier <eikemeier@fillmore-labs.com>
In-Reply-To: <416C21CC.1060305@mac.com>
Message-Id: <B06C0FC0-1CA6-11D9-A5A5-00039312D914@fillmore-labs.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
User-Agent: KMail/1.5.9
cc: FreeBSD ports <ports@FreeBSD.org>
cc: Steven Hartland <killing@multiplay.co.uk>
Subject: Re: Email nagging, was: Re: Ports with version numbers going
	backwards: graphics/gd,japanese/gd, ukrain...
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2004 23:30:14 -0000

Chuck Swiger wrote:

> Steven Hartland wrote:
>> Please tell me we aren't going to get one of these every hour till 
>> they are fix :P
>
> I'd hate to disagree with you when you're right.  For that matter, I'd 
> hate to disagree with someone else if they were right, too. :-)
>
> Could someone change the nag script to send to ports-committers, 
> instead?
> Or run less often via cron (once per day)?  Or run more often but more 
> usefully, by going in as a CVS-commit time check rather than afterwards?

Uhm, I wonder why you are fine with hourly `INDEX build failed' 
messages, but oppose those addressing PORTVERSION. Any crucial 
difference I'm missing?
-Oliver