From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Thu Aug 27 12:03:01 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCDEA9C48CC for ; Thu, 27 Aug 2015 12:03:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from quartz@sneakertech.com) Received: from douhisi.pair.com (douhisi.pair.com [209.68.5.179]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9E8611A67 for ; Thu, 27 Aug 2015 12:03:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from quartz@sneakertech.com) Received: from [10.2.2.1] (pool-173-48-121-235.bstnma.fios.verizon.net [173.48.121.235]) by douhisi.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DC21D3F6EF for ; Thu, 27 Aug 2015 08:03:00 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <55DEFC74.3040609@sneakertech.com> Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2015 08:03:00 -0400 From: Quartz MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Stop using a SATA drive References: <20150824214252.53aa04c6.freebsd@edvax.de> <55DEF869.1010202@sneakertech.com> <55DEFB5A.3080408@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <55DEFB5A.3080408@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2015 12:03:01 -0000 > FreeBSD runs on all sorts of different kit from all sorts of different > providers, hence the uniform interface that Apple has achieved is much > harder. I can understand that argument for physically powering down a device, but whether or not a particular item shows up in a particular directory is entirely a software issue, isn't it?