From owner-freebsd-doc  Wed Jan 31 01:56:16 1996
Return-Path: owner-doc
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id BAA06621
          for doc-outgoing; Wed, 31 Jan 1996 01:56:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nixpbe.pdb.sni.de (mail.sni.de [192.109.2.33])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id BAA06570
          for <doc@freebsd.org>; Wed, 31 Jan 1996 01:56:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from nerv@localhost) by nixpbe.pdb.sni.de (8.6.12/8.6.12) id KAA05389 for doc@freebsd.org; Wed, 31 Jan 1996 10:55:55 +0100
Message-Id: <199601310955.KAA05389@nixpbe.pdb.sni.de>
Subject: Re: What printed documentation do we need?
To: peter@taronga.com (Peter da Silva)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 96 10:51:50 MET
From: Greg Lehey <lehey.pad@sni.de>
Cc: doc@freebsd.org
In-Reply-To: <no.id>; from "Peter da Silva" at Jan 30, 96 7:31 pm
X-Mailer: xmail 2.4 (based on ELM 2.2 PL16)
Sender: owner-doc@freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk

> In article <199601301534.QAA05327@nixpbe.pdb.sni.de>,
> Greg Lehey  <lehey.pad@sni.de> wrote:
>> I think the usable stuff is worth including, certainly if it isn't
>> covered by an AT&T copyright.  If it *is*, it doesn't mean it's off
>> limits, it might just mean that somebody has to approach AT&T and get
>> permission.
>
> Which AT&T?

Dunno.  Maybe none at all.

> (they split up again, dmr was pretty bummed out at Usenix about it)

Sounds like dmr.

> Also, did the copyright on this stuff trickle over to USL/Novell/SCO?

Possibly.  Maybe I can find somebody at SCO who can tell me.  Does
anybody else have an idea how to find out?

Greg