From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Apr 21 17:04:53 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91C7E37B401
	for <ports@freebsd.org>; Mon, 21 Apr 2003 17:04:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hueymiccailhuitl.mtu.ru (hueytecuilhuitl.mtu.ru
	[195.34.32.123])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00AD043FDF
	for <ports@freebsd.org>; Mon, 21 Apr 2003 17:04:53 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from sem@ciam.ru)
Received: from ciam.ru (ppp135-164.dialup.mtu-net.ru [62.118.135.164])
	by hueymiccailhuitl.mtu.ru (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 5A023F976A; Tue, 22 Apr 2003 04:04:11 +0400 (MSD)
	(envelope-from sem@ciam.ru)
Message-ID: <3EA48724.3080602@ciam.ru>
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2003 04:04:52 +0400
From: Sergey Matveychuk <sem@ciam.ru>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; ru-RU;
	rv:1.3) Gecko/20030309
X-Accept-Language: ru-ru, ru
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
References: <000501c3074c$e5c2be80$0a2da8c0@sem>
	<20030421210257.GA58574@rot13.obsecurity.org>
In-Reply-To: <20030421210257.GA58574@rot13.obsecurity.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
cc: ports@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Recent bsd.port.mk changes
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2003 00:04:53 -0000

Kris Kennaway wrote:

> If you compile e.g. python modules against multiple versions of
> python, they will have different package names and install in
> different places (so the packages do not conflict at all), but the
> same origin.  The new check will not allow the user to do this.

I'v never seen this case. How looks like its names in PKG_DBDIR?

-- 
Sem.