From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 12 17:32:58 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17F06106564A; Fri, 12 Aug 2011 17:32:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pgollucci@p6m7g8.com) Received: from exhub015-2.exch015.msoutlookonline.net (exhub015-2.exch015.msoutlookonline.net [207.5.72.94]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01AB38FC0A; Fri, 12 Aug 2011 17:32:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from philip.hq.rws (174.79.184.239) by smtpx15.msoutlookonline.net (207.5.72.103) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.2.254.0; Fri, 12 Aug 2011 10:12:55 -0700 Message-ID: <4E455F16.3010300@p6m7g8.com> Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2011 17:12:54 +0000 From: "Philip M. Gollucci" Organization: P6M7G8 Inc. User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.16) Gecko/20110507 Thunderbird/3.0.11 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jo Rhett References: <4C783C77-2645-4D71-B1B7-559CBF800BB2@netconsonance.com> In-Reply-To: <4C783C77-2645-4D71-B1B7-559CBF800BB2@netconsonance.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: ports@freebsd.org, dsh , apache@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: apache-2.2.19 (Update) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2011 17:32:58 -0000 Do not make a repo copy for this. www/apache23 is correct, but the files/ should start out empty. Please co-ordinate with apache@ On 08/11/11 21:12, Jo Rhett wrote: > Make an www/apache23 port if there isn't one already. In no case would putting Apache 2.3 in the www/apache22 port make any sense. > > On Aug 11, 2011, at 8:07 AM, dsh wrote: >> I intend to create an Apache Tuscany (native) [1] port for FreeBSD. >> Apache Tuscany uses Apache httpd 2.3 beta instead of 2.2. Would it be >> possible to upgrade the >> existing Apache httpd 2.2 port or would it make more sense to >> introduce an additional Apache httpd 2.3 port that would exist in >> parallel? >> >> I would appreciate some guidance on the above question and if you >> think it would make sense I would also go ahead and create the >> necessary port descriptor files for an additional Apache http 2.3 >> port. >> >> [1] http://tuscany.apache.org/sca-native.html >> >> Cheers >> Daniel >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-apache@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-apache >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-apache-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1024D/DB9B8C1C B90B FBC3 A3A1 C71A 8E70 3F8C 75B8 8FFB DB9B 8C1C Philip M. Gollucci (pgollucci@p6m7g8.com) c: 703.336.9354 VP Infrastructure, Apache Software Foundation Committer, FreeBSD Foundation Consultant, P6M7G8 Inc. Sr. System Admin, Ridecharge Inc. Work like you don't need the money, love like you'll never get hurt, and dance like nobody's watching.