Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 09:54:19 -0500 From: Brooks Davis <brooks@one-eyed-alien.net> To: Stefan Bethke <stb@lassitu.de> Cc: Yar Tikhiy <yar@comp.chem.msu.su>, brooks@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, thompsa@freebsd.org, drl@MyBSD.org.my Subject: Re: Default route (IPv4) demolished by destroying clone (gif/gre) interface Message-ID: <20060816145419.GB62485@lor.one-eyed-alien.net> In-Reply-To: <FED9705F-B445-4495-B90F-A656AAA966EE@lassitu.de> References: <20060815040736.2f85f090.drl@MyBSD.org.my> <9405D801-3435-419A-9541-E1A9B2CF26D2@lassitu.de> <20060816081130.GB81271@comp.chem.msu.su> <FED9705F-B445-4495-B90F-A656AAA966EE@lassitu.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--yNb1oOkm5a9FJOVX Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Aug 16, 2006 at 10:23:13AM +0200, Stefan Bethke wrote: >=20 > Ouch. Don't ppp(8), OpenVPN etc. destroy the tun interface they're =20 > using when they exit? Flushing all routes then would be rather =20 > harmful. I'm glad I haven't updated to a newer -stable yet then :-) In general, no since tun interfaces can not be destroyed. -- Brooks --yNb1oOkm5a9FJOVX Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFE4zGbXY6L6fI4GtQRAnlYAJ4zX0TTmST4YUindoTG6NCqV6KsxwCfSOQB NgJye6VQ43LUfmOL1YYbD3o= =Zs9m -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --yNb1oOkm5a9FJOVX--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060816145419.GB62485>