From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 5 07:09:21 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73FEA16A4CE for ; Thu, 5 Feb 2004 07:09:21 -0800 (PST) Received: from harmony.village.org (rover.bsdimp.com [204.144.255.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FC2443D2F for ; Thu, 5 Feb 2004 07:09:20 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Received: from localhost (warner@rover2.village.org [10.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.12.10/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i15F9JnJ026603; Thu, 5 Feb 2004 08:09:19 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2004 08:09:08 -0700 (MST) Message-Id: <20040205.080908.65986609.imp@bsdimp.com> To: kris@obsecurity.org From: "M. Warner Losh" In-Reply-To: <20040204184923.GA26210@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20040204184646.GA43390@mighty.grot.org> <20040204184923.GA26210@xor.obsecurity.org> X-Mailer: Mew version 3.3 on Emacs 21.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: aditya@grot.org cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cross-arch filesystem mounts in current? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2004 15:09:21 -0000 In message: <20040204184923.GA26210@xor.obsecurity.org> Kris Kennaway writes: : On Wed, Feb 04, 2004 at 01:46:46PM -0500, Aditya wrote: : > I have an IDE drive with a FreeBSD 4.x filesystem created on a i386 machine : > that I'm trying to mount on a sparc64 machine (Netra X1) running -CURRENT and : > it's unclear how to do it -- any hints? : : I don't think this is possible on FreeBSD, because of the different : endianness of the filesystems. Correct. The endian agnostic changes that NetBSD has done to ufs haven't been brought into FreeBSD. Further, the disk labels for different endian machines seem to have different orders so you get the sort of thing that Aditya is seeing with disklabel too. Warner