From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 22 19:10:17 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BF3716A41F for ; Sun, 22 Jan 2006 19:10:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 454F643D49 for ; Sun, 22 Jan 2006 19:10:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k0MJA9vX022795 for ; Sun, 22 Jan 2006 19:10:09 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id k0MJA9fu022794; Sun, 22 Jan 2006 19:10:09 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2006 19:10:09 GMT Message-Id: <200601221910.k0MJA9fu022794@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: "Jeffrey H. Johnson" Cc: Subject: Re: ports/92146: [NEW PORT] misc/newer: An implementation of AT&T Research UNIX V8 newer(1) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: "Jeffrey H. Johnson" List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2006 19:10:17 -0000 The following reply was made to PR ports/92146; it has been noted by GNATS. From: "Jeffrey H. Johnson" To: Sergey Matveychuk , bug-followup@FreeBSD.org Cc: CPE1704TKS@bellsouth.net Subject: Re: ports/92146: [NEW PORT] misc/newer: An implementation of AT&T Research UNIX V8 newer(1) Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2006 14:05:44 -0500 On January 22, 2006 9:56 PM +0300 Sergey Matveychuk wrote: > What is a difference the utility to system newer(1)? System newer(1)?! I don't have that on my machine here. Is it part of some other port, or is still in 6? It's not in bin, usr.bin or usr.sbin at least... If it is part of another port, we should note that, and add a CONFLICT. If I'm totally off-base here, I apologize in advance. -- Jeffrey H. Johnson CPE1704TKS@bellsouth.net