From owner-freebsd-security Sat Sep 23 15:22:50 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from mail.kyx.net (cr95838-b.crdva1.bc.wave.home.com [24.113.50.147]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8981F37B424 for ; Sat, 23 Sep 2000 15:22:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smp.kyx.net (unknown [10.22.22.45]) by mail.kyx.net (Postfix) with SMTP id AD9811DC03; Sat, 23 Sep 2000 15:22:03 -0700 (PDT) From: Dragos Ruiu Organization: kyx.net To: Lyndon Nerenberg , Gerhard Sittig Subject: Re: sendmail default run state Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2000 15:21:07 -0700 X-Mailer: KYX-CP/M [version core00-mail-92] Content-Type: text/plain Cc: security@FreeBSD.ORG References: <200009231949.e8NJnX143291@orthanc.ab.ca> In-Reply-To: <200009231949.e8NJnX143291@orthanc.ab.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <0009231524220Y.00325@smp.kyx.net> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Sat, 23 Sep 2000, Lyndon Nerenberg wrote: > Nope. Most MUAs these days talk SMTP for submission. And SMTP submission > will become even more common. If you need DNSs or message tracking you > must inject using SMTP. I think Lyndon is right on this. I've been doing a survey of mailling list processor software trying to get some gpg based mailing lists up and all of the ones that I looked at that had code available used SMTP injection even on the local machine. It's just one mileage point but it supports his assertion. > With the introduction of the SUBMIT profile for SMTP you'll see > most sites eventually migrate to requiring message injection via port > 587. > Do you have a ref for this? cheers, --dr -- Dragos Ruiu dursec.com ltd. / kyx.net - we're from the future gpg/pgp key on file at wwwkeys.pgp.net To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message