Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2015 07:05:57 -0500 From: Jerry <jerry@seibercom.net> To: FreeBSD FreeBSD <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Unzip utility choice decision Message-ID: <20151223070557.7173c129@seibercom.net> In-Reply-To: <CAOc73CD0wUexp9JA4iEOW%2BqEPcCf7gfBhygLx_6WqNsAyCk1Yw@mail.gmail.com> References: <BAY169-W9776556FEBDA58E22FA457A71A0@phx.gbl> <CAOc73CAWJd05L0P833XzmgMXuUDd3hX2ypcbUmQfNxCBoS2rHA@mail.gmail.com> <BAY169-W71CF3A8E16B1C9CD623C54A7E60@phx.gbl> <CAOc73CD0wUexp9JA4iEOW%2BqEPcCf7gfBhygLx_6WqNsAyCk1Yw@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 23 Dec 2015 09:23:47 +0100, Ben Woods stated: > This is for the same reason that there is a "universally recognized" > document editor called Microsoft Word. Why would you have a separate Open > Office application? The answer is of course for the more permissive license. So, you are stating the use of one "ZIP" application is preferred over another one due to the permissiveness of its license? -- Jerry
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20151223070557.7173c129>