Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2003 03:17:42 +0300 From: Sergey Matveychuk <sem@ciam.ru> To: Oliver Eikemeier <eikemeier@fillmore-labs.com> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Ability for maintainers to update own ports Message-ID: <3FB02AA6.6000803@ciam.ru> In-Reply-To: <3FB00E53.8060603@fillmore-labs.com> References: <1068458390.38101.19.camel@dirk.no.domain> <20031110152000.622db381.lehmann@ans-netz.de> <1068471598.38101.77.camel@dirk.no.domain> <20031110163623.GC93583@procyon.firepipe.net> <1068495958.690.72.camel@leguin> <53EC784E-13C5-11D8-AD24-003065ABFD92@mac.com> <3FB00E53.8060603@fillmore-labs.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Oliver Eikemeier wrote: > The first can be satisfied with something like pkgsrc-wip, and I always > wondered why we don't have a ports-FRESH and ports-TESTED, like we have > -CURRENT and -STABLE. Yes. It's a good point to have two branches for ports. So many times I cvs'ed an old port version because found a new one unstable... --- Sem.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3FB02AA6.6000803>