From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 10 18:05:51 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2888516A41F for ; Wed, 10 Aug 2005 18:05:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from swhetzel@gmail.com) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.201]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45EB243D46 for ; Wed, 10 Aug 2005 18:05:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from swhetzel@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i5so189875wra for ; Wed, 10 Aug 2005 11:05:49 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=UwsUY8/Nk1kq525u0mpy2xKrq5t8sHSVeOjvrtGfGApoKc/XZYeMwGWgo0WZaFX5vQzJ316YSTaqyj9TzeRw0BbSLZZk7FT7SvrqP2SmlYKpabEnbUlejl+5ljJFKGif+3sXlt1zSIxi2U4kLZpQuRho4DssjF+lI9v4UpDlwLg= Received: by 10.54.34.33 with SMTP id h33mr632193wrh; Wed, 10 Aug 2005 11:05:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.29.26 with HTTP; Wed, 10 Aug 2005 11:05:49 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <790a9fff05081011053b4b91a0@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2005 13:05:49 -0500 From: Scot Hetzel To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?S=F8ren_Schmidt?= In-Reply-To: <4A1BF8DF-EC50-4067-A69B-84D9BE5B22C7@FreeBSD.ORG> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <42F7F7E8.1020507@mail.uni-mainz.de> <42F9609E.1010207@goldsword.com> <20050810023111.GA2913@FS.denninger.net> <20050810024618.GA8198@drjekyll.mkbuelow.net> <6.2.1.2.0.20050810081251.05298ff0@64.7.153.2> <20050810133159.GA10150@FS.denninger.net> <6.2.1.2.0.20050810094204.06c46098@64.7.153.2> <20050810144148.GB10150@FS.denninger.net> <790a9fff0508100844a7e5435@mail.gmail.com> <4A1BF8DF-EC50-4067-A69B-84D9BE5B22C7@FreeBSD.ORG> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ad10: WARNING - READ_DMA UDMA ICRC error (retrying request) LBA=11441599 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2005 18:05:51 -0000 On 8/10/05, S=F8ren Schmidt wrote: >=20 > On 10/08/2005, at 17:44, Scot Hetzel wrote: >=20 > > On 8/10/05, Karl Denninger wrote: > > > >> On Wed, Aug 10, 2005 at 09:51:03AM -0400, Mike Tancsa wrote: > >> > >>> At 09:31 AM 10/08/2005, Karl Denninger wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>>> Also, I've yet to see a developer commit on the list that they > >>>> WILL fix it > >>>> if > >>>> such a controller board is forthcoming (and will return the > >>>> board when > >>>> they're > >>>> done) - I've got two of these cards here (choose between Adaptec > >>>> and > >>>> Bustek) > >>>> and would be happy to UPS one to someone IF I had a firm > >>>> commitment that > >>>> 6.x > >>>> would NOT go out without this being addressed and that the board > >>>> would be > >>>> returned to me when work was complete. > >>>> > >>> > >>> You demand to see support for this chipset fixed, yet, you cant > >>> pony up a > >>> measly hundred bucks to donate the card to the developer who is > >>> not being > >>> paid to develop anything. > >>> > >>> ---Mike > >>> > >> > >> I have "demanded" nothing Mike. > >> > >> > > I agree Mike's wording was a little strong, but we have seen you > > request strongly that some one fix this problem. > > > > Have you contacted S=F8ren, to see if he has the troublesome hardware? > > > > Also contact S=F8ren directly with your offer to supply a troublesome > > board, and/or access to a system that displays the problem. More than > > likely he would agree to return the board once he has a proper fix for > > the problem. >=20 > Since I came in late in this, I need to know what kind of controller > we are talking about, and if the problem is still present in 6.0. > I plan to backport ATA from 6.0 to 5-stable when it has settled, so > 6.0 is the one and only (pre)release to test with and get back to me > with the result. >=20 They have been talking about SII and Intel ICH6 chips. And a few have stated that they are having problems with the 6.0-Beta releases with these chips. --=20 DISCLAIMER: No electrons were mamed while sending this message. Only slightly bruised.